History
  • No items yet
midpage
Riggs v. Anderson
260 N.C. 221
N.C.
1963
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The court did not err in nonsuiting plaintiffs. No memorandum or other instrument of writing containing the terms of the alleged offer and acceptance were signed by the parties or their attorneys or placed upon the minutes of the court, so far as the record on appeal discloses. Defendants accepted no part of the money tendered. A wholly unexecuted parol contract to sell land is void. Carpenter v. Yancey, 231 N.C. 160, 56 S.E. 2d 396; Kluttz v. Allison, 214 N.C. 379, 199 S.E. 395. A defense of the statute of frauds may be taken advantage of by general denial. Humphrey v. Faison, 247 N.C. *223127, 100 S.E. 2d 524; 2 Strong: N. C. Index, Frauds, Statute of, s. 3, p. 389.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Riggs v. Anderson
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 18, 1963
Citation: 260 N.C. 221
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.