History
  • No items yet
midpage
Riggle v. State
81 Tex. Crim. 658
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1917
|
Check Treatment

This conviction was for violation of article 302, P.C., wherein appellant was convicted for exhibiting in a place of amusement a moving picture show on Sunday.

The majority of the court have held the law constitutional and valid in the Zucarro case, this day decided. I can not agree and will write reasons later for that non-concurrence and file in the Zucarro case. Under the authority of the Zucarro case this judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

[Final dissenting opinion October 22, 1917. — Reporter.]

Case Details

Case Name: Riggle v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 28, 1917
Citation: 81 Tex. Crim. 658
Docket Number: No. 4371.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.