History
  • No items yet
midpage
Riggle v. State
81 Tex. Crim. 658
Tex. Crim. App.
1917
Check Treatment

This conviction was for violation of article 302, P.C., wherein appellant was convicted for exhibiting in a place of amusement a moving picture show on Sunday.

The majority of the court have held the law constitutional and valid in the Zucarro case, this day decided. I can not agree and will write reasons later for that non-concurrence and file in the Zucarro case. Under the authority of the Zucarro case this judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

[Final dissenting opinion October 22, 1917. — Reporter.]

Case Details

Case Name: Riggle v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 28, 1917
Citation: 81 Tex. Crim. 658
Docket Number: No. 4371.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.