History
  • No items yet
midpage
Riddle Banks v. Commissioner of Social Security
1:16-cv-02571
N.D. Ohio
Sep 27, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Jontell Riddle Banks, ) CASE NO. 1:16 CV 2571

) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN ) Vs. ) ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) Memorandum of Opinion and Order )

) Defendant. ) INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke (Doc. 16), recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED. No objections have been field. For the reasons that follow, the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When objections are made to a Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the district court reviews the case de novo . Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides in

1 *2 pertinent part:

The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written objection has been made in accordance with this rule. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended decision, receive further evidence, or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.

As stated in the Advisory Committee Notes, “When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” In Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985), the Court held, “It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate judge’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”

DECISION

This Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error, hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. In accordance with that recommendation, judgment is entered in favor of the Commissioner for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge and the Report and Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Patricia A. Gaughan PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN United States District Judge Chief Judge Dated: 9/27/17

2

Case Details

Case Name: Riddle Banks v. Commissioner of Social Security
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Date Published: Sep 27, 2017
Docket Number: 1:16-cv-02571
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.