History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rick Slorp v. Lerner, Sampson & Rothfuss
690 F. App'x 905
| 6th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 BEFORE: MOORE, GIBBONS, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-appellant Rick Slorp appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendants. Slorp filed a complaint against defendants Lerner, Sampson & Rothfuss (a law firm), Bank of America, and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, claiming that defendants attempted to fraudulently foreclose on his home. Previously, after dismissing much of Slorp’s complaint, we remanded this matter to the district court for consideration of one remaining count—namely, a civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claim, predicated on allegations of mail and wire fraud. Slorp v. Lerner, Sampson & Rothfuss , 587 F. App’x 249, 264–66 (6th Cir. 2014). We cautioned, however, that Slorp’s claim would “vanish” if defendant Bank of America was found to be a legitimate mortgagee. Id . at 264. The district court found Bank of America was a legitimate mortgagee, and we agree with its reasoning and result. For the reasons set forth in the district court’s opinion, we affirm the grant of summary judgment for defendants.

Case Details

Case Name: Rick Slorp v. Lerner, Sampson & Rothfuss
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 28, 2017
Citation: 690 F. App'x 905
Docket Number: 16-3936
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.