History
  • No items yet
midpage
Richman v. Fleisher
274 A.D. 983
N.Y. App. Div.
1948
Check Treatment

The appellants’ brief points out that the defendants Henry Pearce and Jules Mayer, who were formerly managing agents of the building in question, had no privity whatsoever therewith during the period here involved. The brief of the plaintiff admits that as to said defendants the action has been discontinued. The attorney for the plaintiff has submitted a stipulation discontinuing the action, so far as the plaintiff is concerned, against the defendants, Pearce and Mayer. Order unanimously modified by excluding from its provisions the defendants, Pearce and Mayer, and by reducing the total fine as to the remaining defendants to the sum of $250, and as so modified' affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Richman v. Fleisher
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 13, 1948
Citation: 274 A.D. 983
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.