History
  • No items yet
midpage
Richardson v. Pitts
56 S.E. 105
Ga.
1906
Check Treatment
Lumpkin, J.

1. “Where each of two coterminous proprietors recognizes the ownership of the other, and that the tract of each is bounded by that of the other, the ascertainment of the true line between them fixes the extent of their respective tracts.” Phillips v. O’Neal, 87 Ga. 727; Farr v. Woolfolk, 118 Ga. 277.

2. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the charge complained of, and to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Richardson v. Pitts
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 13, 1906
Citation: 56 S.E. 105
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.