History
  • No items yet
midpage
Richardson v. Backus
1 Johns. 493
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1806
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The writ of error was a supersedeas to the execuĂ­ion. A recognizance taken before a judge at his chimbers, is a sufficient compliance with t >e directions of the act. Th iugh taken after the inquisition and before the rale for judgment, it is not vitiated. It was during the term, at which the inquisition was returned, and the motion made for judgment. The penalty was to the amount of the judgment, and the bail are estopped from gainsaying their recognizance. It will be deemed as taking effect fro n the judg neat. As the attorney of the plaintiff is supposed to have acted bona fide, we shall save him from the consequences of his act. The rule is, therefore, granted with the costs of this application, on condition that no action for false imprisonment be brought by fhe defendant.

Rule granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Richardson v. Backus
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1806
Citation: 1 Johns. 493
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.