104 Pa. 567 | Pa. | 1883
delivered the opinion of the court, Jan-nary 7th 1884.
The only question presented by this record is whether the deed from Jehu P. Smith to his daughter Margaret, created a sole and separate use for the said Margaret. The conveyance is to the said Margaret, her heirs and assigns, “ as the separate estate of the said Margaret.” -The same expression occurs in the habendum clause of the deed, which is as follows: “ To have and to hold the said land .... unto the said party of the second part, her heirs and assigns, for the only proper use and behoof of the said party of the second part, her heirs and assigns forever, as the separate estate of said Margaret E. Aiken.”
An estate limited to a feme covert for her sole and separate use has always been known as, and entitled her separate estate.
Even if the intention had been clear, which it is not, to confine the grantor to a life estate, and bar her husband’s marital rights in the property, we are of opinion it was beyond the power of the grantor. . There is nothing upon the record to show Mrs. Aiken’s consent to such an arrangement. On the contrary, the agreement of herself and husband to convey the land to the plaintiff in error in fee is conclusive that she declines to be bound by the restriction.
We are of opinion that the defendants in error have a good marketable title to the land which they 'can convey to the plaintiff in error in fee, and the judgment therefore is
Affirmed.