History
  • No items yet
midpage
Richards v. Oakley
248 U.S. 541
SCOTUS
1918
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257. (2) Goodrich v. Ferris, 244 U. S. 71, 81; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Brolan *542v. United States, 236 U. S. 216.

Mr. John G. Park for plaintiffs in error.. Mr. William S. Hogsett and Mr. Mont T. Prewitt for defendant in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Richards v. Oakley
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 23, 1918
Citation: 248 U.S. 541
Docket Number: No. 634
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.