History
  • No items yet
midpage
42 A.3d 1002
Pa.
2012

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2012, upon agreement of Appellant and the Corrections Appellees that the Commonwealth Court misconstrued the factual allegations of Appellant’s Amended Petition for Review, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration of the preliminary objections.

Case Details

Case Name: Richards v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 25, 2012
Citations: 42 A.3d 1002; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 980; 615 Pa. 329; 2012 WL 1434881; 42 EAP 2011
Docket Number: 42 EAP 2011
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Richards v. Commonwealth, 42 A.3d 1002