History
  • No items yet
midpage
Richard Lee v. Robert Lampert
633 F.3d 1176
9th Cir.
2011
Check Treatment
Docket

Richard R. LEE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert O. LAMPERT, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 09-35276.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 8, 2011.

APPENDIX—Continued

Abercrombie‘s “Ruehl” design.

Stephen R. Sady, FPDOR—Federal Public Defender‘s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellee.

Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, Carolyn Alexander, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Oregon Department of Justice, Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, AGOR—Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Respondent-Appellant.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Richard Lee v. Robert Lampert
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 8, 2011
Citation: 633 F.3d 1176
Docket Number: 09-35276
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.