Richard Friedman Associates, CPA PC v. JereskiRichard Friedman Associates, CPA PC v. Jereski
With exceptions not here at issue, the subject retainer agreement clearly required payment, without reduction, of the invoiced amounts for accounting services rendered by plaintiff to defendant. Defendant admitted that she was satisfied with plaintiff‘s services and failed to establish a defense to payment therefor (see Brignoli v Balch, Hardy & Scheinman, 178 AD2d 290 [1991]), either on the ground of excessiveness or duress. Inasmuch as the retainer agreement also entitled plaintiff to re
We have considered defendant‘s remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.