Rice v. Stoneham

228 A.D. 740 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1930

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Van Kirk, P. J., Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Davis, J., dissents and votes for reversal, on the ground that the decedent was not engaged in an employment classified in the statute as hazardous.