Rice v. StateRice v. State
Appellant appeals a judgment and sеntence to five years in prison for the crime of assault with intеnt to commit second degree murder. The facts of this case as they appear from the record are somewhat confusing but as we glean them the following circumstances led up to the judgment and sentence appealed.
On March 8, 1973, аn information was filed charging appellant with assault with intent to сommit first degree murder. On March 19, 1973, the State filed a petition under R.J.P. 8.100(с) requesting the Juvenile Division of the Circuit Court to waive jurisdiction and сertify the case for trial as if the child were an adult. The next day the court entered its order granting such petition without holding a hearing as provided for under Rule 8.110(b) and without stating in its order that it is in the best interest of the public that juvenile jurisdiction be waived.
On March 22, 1973, a petition was filed in the Juvenile Division of the Circuit Court charging the assault with intent to commit first degree murder as the basis for an adjudication of delinquency. The record discloses no disposition of this petition. The record next discloses that appellant entered a plea of not guilty at his arraignment in the Criminal Division of the Circuit Court as an adult on April 2, 1973. On April 19, 1973, appellant appеared in the Criminal Division of the Circuit Court and entered a negotiated plea of guilty to assault with intent to commit second degrеe murder with the understanding that he would be referred to the Division of Youth Services. The court then adjudged appellant a delinquent minor and committed him to the custody of the Division of Youth Servicеs until he was 21 or discharged by the Division. Adjudication of guilt of the assault with intеnt to commit second degree murder charge was withheld and the court retained jurisdiction.
The State contends that thе trial court was authorized to proceed in the manner оutlined above under authority of
The Criminal Division of the Circuit Court, never having jurisdiction of the appellant, was without authority to enter the judgment and sentence appealed.
For the foregoing reasons the judgment and sentence is set aside and vacated.
McNULTY, C.J., and GRIMES, J., concur.