Rice v. StateRice v. State
Appellant‘s pro se motion under
The trial court summarily denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing and without attaching to the order those portions of the record which conclusively show that petitioner is entitled to no relief.
The allegation that the sentence violated the plea bargain and was thus so involuntary as to require the court to permit petitioner to withdraw his plea is facially sufficient. Brown v. State, 245 So.2d 41 (Fla. 1971); Davy v. State, 356 So.2d 18 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Since the record before us does not conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief, we are compelled to reverse the order and remand the cause so that the trial judge may either attach to the order those portions of the record which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief, or grant an evidentiary hearing. Gunter v. State, 380 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Payne v. State, 362 So.2d 688 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.
COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.