History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rice v. Mayo
107 Mass. 550
Mass.
1871
Check Treatment
Gbay, J.

If the agreement was as contended by the plaintiffs, they were entitled to a commission if they endeavored to sell the defendant’s land, and a sale was afterwards effected, either *552with or without the aid of the plaintiffs • and evidence that the defendant afterwards employed another broker to sell the land was immaterial, either upon the construction of such an agreement, or to prove what the agreement was. Loud v. Hall, 106 Mass. 404. A contract or memorandum in writing, binding both seller and purchaser, was a sale effected, within the meaning of the agreement on which the plaintiffs relied, although a formal deed had not been executed and delivered.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Rice v. Mayo
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1871
Citation: 107 Mass. 550
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.