23 Colo. 253 | Colo. | 1896
delivered the opinion of the court.
Counsel for the appellant concede that the first five causes of action are good. The others are said to be defective in
It appears from the complaint that the first five causes of action were for liens claimed by the respective claimants for materials furnished, or for labor performed, by themselves. The causes numbered consecutively from six to thirteen were in favor of Florence Sullivan, one of which accrued to Sullivan for services which he himself performed, and the other seven were upon claims which had been assigned to him by other persons for the purpose of this foreclosure, which our statute permits. The causes of action numbered consecutively from fourteen to eighteen were in favor of Peter Daly as plaintiff, one of which was for services performed by him, and the other four he asserted as assignee.
An examination of the complaint shows that Sullivan, as plaintiff, did not, in each of these eight causes of action, make the averment that he served upon the defendant the notice, or filed with the county clerk the statement, re. quired by the statute. But at the end of the statement of the thirteenth cause of action are found allegations to the effect that the said seven liens so assigned to Sullivan were assigned to him before the service of notice and filing of statement, and that thereafter and within the statutory time he did serve upon the defendant a written notice and filed with the clerk the statement required, in each of which he combined with the claim accruing to him in his own right all the said claims which had been theretofore assigned to him.
Our statute (Mills’ Ann. Stats., sec. 2894) permits an assignment of claims before or after the filing of the statement
The causes of action accruing to the plaintiff Peter Daly are in the same situation as those in favor of the plaintiff Sullivan, and the same rule is applicable.
It follows that the judgment below was right, and it is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.