History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rhodes v. State
683 So. 2d 640
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1996
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although afforded an opportunity to file a brief in proper person, appellant has elected not to do so. Having carefully reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we remand with directions that the $2.00 cost imposed for Criminal Justice Education by Municipalities and Counties be stricken, because this was a discretionary cost pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), and could not be imposed without affording appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. E.g., Brooks v. State, 676 So.2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Rhodes v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 2, 1996
Citation: 683 So. 2d 640
Docket Number: No. 94-3577
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.