Rhodes v. State

Sep 11, 1926
No. 5210
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Beck
Beck, P. J.

1. The constitutional questions ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‍raised in this case by the plaintiff in error are decided adversely ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‍to his contentions, in the case of Williams v. State, ante, 327 (133 S. E. 843).

2. ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‍Under the evidence in the case there was no abuse of ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‍discretion on the part of the court in revoking the parole of ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‍the accused.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.