History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reynolds v. State
24 Ga. 427
Ga.
1858
Check Treatment
Lumpkin J.

By ¿he Court. delivering the opinion.

We think the evidence on the part of the State too slight and uncertain to convict the defendant, and that he is entitled to a new trial. He may be a hog-thief, but the proof should be clear, to convict a citizen of the offence charged. Upon the testimony, there is certainly room to doubt the guilt of the accused. The proof for ' him is stronger and more direct than the proof against him.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Reynolds v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 15, 1858
Citation: 24 Ga. 427
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.