History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reynolds v. State
163 Tex. Crim. 536
Tex. Crim. App.
1956
Check Treatment
WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is upon a plea of guilty before the court under an indictment in two counts, charging forgery and passing and attempting to pass a forged instrument.

The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception.

The court, in his judgment, found appellant guilty of forgery “and passing” and assessed a two year term in the penitentiary and the sentence follows the judgment.

A similar judgment where the court had assessed the punishment at seven years was reformed so as to adjudge the defendant guilty of forgery in Clark v. State, 289 S.W. 2d 248.

The judgment is reformed so as to eliminate the words “and passing” and adjudge appellant guilty of forgery, and the sentence is reformed so as to conform to the judgment.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Reynolds v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 24, 1956
Citation: 163 Tex. Crim. 536
Docket Number: No. 28,442
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.