History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reyes v. Sequeira
68 A.D.3d 526
N.Y. App. Div.
2009
Check Treatment

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gerald Agnew, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

2009

889 NYS2d 451

The court properly applied the presumptive override for a prior felony sex crime conviction, and properly denied defendant‘s request for a downward departure (see People v Judd, 29 AD3d 431 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 709 [2006]). There is no support for defendant‘s position that the override was not intended to apply when one of the felonies involved an undercover operation, rather than an actual underage victim. Defendant‘s conduct demonstrated a high risk of sexual recidivism, not lessened by the fact that the crime was only an attempt, or the fact that the intended victim, believed by defendant to be a child, was actually an undercover officer.

Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Reyes v. Sequeira
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 2009
Citation: 68 A.D.3d 526
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In