History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reuter v. Noridian Mutual Insurance Company
6:16-cv-02243
D. Or.
Mar 1, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 6:16-cv-02243-MC Document 20 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ERNST REUTER, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:16-cv-02243-MC v. OPINION AND ORDER NORIDIAN MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant.

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge :

Plaintiff pro se

filed his original complaint on October 7, 2016 in Lane County state court and was subsequently removed to federal court. Notice of Removal Ex. A, ECF No. 1. On January 12, 2017, this Court issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for failing to allege facts sufficient to raise a right of relief. Order, ECF No. 19. In consideration of plaintiff’s pro se status, this Court granted plaintiff until February 12, 2017 “to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified.” Id . at 3. The Court also offered to provide plaintiff with pro bono counsel for purposes of a consultation on how best to proceed along with contact information. Id . 1 – OPINION AND ORDER

Case 6:16-cv-02243-MC Document 20 Filed 03/01/17 Page 2 of 2 Plaintiff has not taken additional action since that time. Accordingly, because plaintiff failed to comply with the Court’s order (ECF No. 19), this action is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 1st day of March, 2017.

____/s/Michael J. McShane_____ Michael J. McShane United States District Judge 2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Case Details

Case Name: Reuter v. Noridian Mutual Insurance Company
Court Name: District Court, D. Oregon
Date Published: Mar 1, 2017
Docket Number: 6:16-cv-02243
Court Abbreviation: D. Or.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.