History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reinholdt v. Alberti
1 Binn. 469
Pa.
1808
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We have no doubt. If the attorney has done wrong, he is answerable for it. But undoubtedly b) the practice of Pennsylvania, the authority of the defendant’s attorney is competent to restore an action after non pros. The authority of an attorney is not limited here in the same manner that it is in England. For a payment to the plaintiff’s attorney, long after judgment, and without execution, has been held good upon argument. Let the rule be discharged.

Rule discharged.

Case Details

Case Name: Reinholdt v. Alberti
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 31, 1808
Citation: 1 Binn. 469
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.