History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reilly v. Frias
143 N.Y.S. 869
N.Y. App. Div.
1913
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

This court cannot undertake to decide the disputed questions of fact upon the hopelessly contradictory affidavits contained in this record. As those are the very matters put in issue by the complaint, counterclaim and reply, an injunction pendente lite preserving the status quo seems authorized. We think, however, that the bond required of the defendant Latin American Contracting and Improvement Company should be increased to $5,000, and that the plaintiff should have leave to renew the .motion to vacate the injunction if the defendants interpose unreasonable delay to the trial of the action. The order appealed from should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, without costs in this court to either party. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as indicated in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Case Details

Case Name: Reilly v. Frias
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1913
Citation: 143 N.Y.S. 869
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.