midpage

Reid v. StateReid v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Sep 29, 1987
86-2176
Reporters:
,
Before:
Hendry, Ferguson, Jorgenson (per curiam)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mulvey v. State, 41 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1949); Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). This case presents the same question certified in Bellinger v. State, 513 So.2d 732 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); and Condiles v. State, 512 So.2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987):

IS USE OF THE HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE TO EXCEED THE STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR THE ‍‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌‍OFFENSE PRECLUDED WHERE THE SENTENCE IMPOSED DOES NOT EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE SENTENCE?

Question certified.

Case Details

Case Name: Reid v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 29, 1987
Citations: 512 So. 2d 1161; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2343; 86-2176
Docket Number: 86-2176
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In