Reid v. Mangham, No. 4409

No. 4409 | Ga. | Oct 16, 1924

Gilbert, J.

The court did not err in refusing an injunction. Under the allegations of the petition, including the deed, we can not hold as a matter of law that the defendant was obligated to supply water for the sprinkler system of the warehouse without payment of the customary and reasonable charges for supplying such water, as in the case of other customers.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. I. N. Cheney and Edwards & Edwards, for plaintiff. E. S. Griffith, for defendant.