108 So. 443 | Miss. | 1926
It is insisted by the appellant that Mrs. Horton's testimony, she being an interested party, is not sufficient to overcome the presumption attaching to the sheriff's official return.
We think the testimony presented a question of fact as to whether the summons was actually served upon Mrs. Horton, and that the chancellor's decree is supported by evidence sufficient to sustain it.
The judgment of the court will, therefore, be affirmed.
Affirmed.