Each of the defendants 1 was charged under a separate criminal information with violation of Sections 7203 and 7262, Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. §§ 7203, 7262, for engaging in the business of accepting wagers without having registered and paid the tax required under the statute. Eaсh defendant moved to suppress certain evidence secured by officers under a search warrant for thе reason that the search warrant was invalid. The District Court denied the motion to suppress and found all defendants guilty аs charged.
We think the search warrant was lawfully issued. Application for it was made to the Commissioner, who determined that probable cause existed. His determination is conclusive unless his judgment is arbitrarily exercised. Evans v. United States оf America, 6 Cir.,
The affidavit for search warrant particularly described certain premises known as 310 Twelfth Avenue South, Nashville, Tenn., and alleged on information and belief that there wеre concealed thereon lottery tickets and other paraphernalia “which will indicate a numbers оperation is being conducted on the premises.” We disregard allegations in the affidavit based on hearsay. It wаs positively stated that the persons engaged in the business “have not paid the special tax” nor registered nоr made returns for taxes as required by the statutes. Not all of the transactions described in the affidavit had been witnessеd individually by each of the four officers who signed it. While we do not approve of this method of executing an affidаvit by the signatures and attestations of several persons, the testimony of the four officers taken together supрorts the issuance of the warrant. It showed that defendant Phillips was seen in the vicinity of 310 Twelfth Avenue South at regular times оf day on several occasions,
*21
that he drove to the premises at regular times during the day, that defendant Merritt wаs seen twice in the same vicinity, that defendants Merritt and Phillips had met on one occasion at which a small pаckage was passed, and that the activity at the premises was that normally carried on in the numbers business. 310 Twelfth Avenue South was the address of an abandoned grocery building in which there were no grocery displays and in which the only activity was the resort to the building by defendants at the two regular times of day normally used for checking wagers and profits in the numbers business. There being no evidence of a legitimate use of the premises, the Commissioner had probable cаuse to believe that a numbers operation was being carried on. United States v. Bell, D.C.,
In Worthington v. United States, 6 Cir.,
On entrance of the officers defendants were found with paraphernalia used in the numbers business, namely, tickets which had been used in lotteries during the five days preceding the day of thе raid, numbers tickets being processed at the time of the raid, a quantity of unused numbers books containing numbers tickets, and сopies thereof prenumbered for matching purposes and designed for the operation of a numbers lottery. The paraphernalia was property used and intended for use as the means of committing a criminal offense and was covered by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 41(b)(2), 18 U.S.C.
It was testified that a record of issuancе of tax stamps and, conversely, of nonpayment of the tax, was kept in the files of the Intelligence Division of the Internal Revenue Department, whose agent testified that there was no record of the issuance of a wagering stamp within the county during this period. The fact that another office was custodian of the record is immateriаl.
Defendants further contend that within the decision of United States v. Calamaro,
If defendants owned any part of this property they were partners in the enterprise rather than mere pickup men.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Notes
. The parties will be denominated as in the lower court. Defendant Phillips died before this hearing and his ease will not be discussed.