History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reeves v. Frost
48 N.Y.S. 1113
N.Y. App. Div.
1897
Check Treatment

No opinion. Judgment of the county court of Oswego county reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the justice’s court affirmed, with costs. Held, that there was some evidence in the justice’s court tending to support the verdict of the jury, and the county court improperly reversed the justice’s judgment. See Schoonmaker v. Spencer, 54 N. Y. 366; Halsey v. Hart, 85 Hun, 46, 32 N. Y. Supp. 665; City of Brooklyn v. Brooklyn City & N. R. Co., 11 App. Div. 168, 42 N. Y. Supp. 371; Staples v. Hager, 11 App. Div. 631, 42 N. Y. Supp. 458; Fandel v. Railroad Co., 15 App. Div. 426, 44 N. Y. Supp. 462; Ludlum v Couch, 10 App. Div. 603, 42 N. Y. Supp. 370; Rogers v. Ackerman, 22 Barb. 134. All concur, except GREEN, J., not voting.

Case Details

Case Name: Reeves v. Frost
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 13, 1897
Citation: 48 N.Y.S. 1113
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.