History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reed v. State
21 S.E.2d 913
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1942
|
Check Treatment

The defendant was convicted under the Code, § 26-2001, of the offense of being a "Peeping Tom." The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. The special ground of the motion for new trial complaining of the admission of evidence, is without merit, under the charge to the jury and under all the facts of the case. It would serve no good purpose to detail the evidence.

Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J.,concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Reed v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 16, 1942
Citation: 21 S.E.2d 913
Docket Number: 29748.
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.