222 Ga. 523 | Ga. | 1966
This is a mandamus action to require the Ordinary, Sheriff and Clerk of the Superior Court of Hall County to cease and desist from designating another
On demurrer all properly pleaded allegations must be accepted as true, and the petition contains allegations of fact which, if true, would be sufficient to show that the newspaper selected does not conform to the requirements of law and that petitioner’s paper is the only qualified one in the county. Code § 39-1101; Code Ann. § 39-1103 (Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 271, 272); Code § 55-110. Both mandamus and injunction will lie and are available and can be combined in the same case since this is a continuing act of alleged illegality. See Dollar v. Wind, 135 Ga. 760 (70 SE 335); Baggerly v. Bainbridge State Bank, 160 Ga. 556 (128 SE 766); Burt v. Crawford, 180 Ga. 331 (179 SE 82); Heath v. Miller, 197 Ga. 443 (29 SE2d 416). The cases of Tilman v. Thrasher, 61 Ga. 15; Simmons v. Lindsay, 144 Ga. 845 (88 SE 199); Shurley v. Black, 156 Ga. 683 (119 SE 618); and Whigham v. Davis, 92 Ga. 574 (18 SE 548) do not hold otherwise. None of the appeals is meritorious.
Judgment affirmed.