History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reed v. Lukens
44 Pa. 200
Pa.
1863
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We affirm this judgment for the reasons-given by the learned judge below. They fully meet the requirements of the ease, and an elaboration of our views on the specifications of error, would be little more than a repetition of what has already been so well said.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Reed v. Lukens
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 1, 1863
Citation: 44 Pa. 200
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.