History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reed v. Kinkela
84 Ohio St. 3d 1427
Ohio
1998
Check Treatment

In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, writ allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. *1428See Workman v. Warden (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 1479, 687 N.E.2d 474; Pegan v. Crawmer (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 607, 609, 653 N.E.2d 659, 661. Respondents are ordered to file a return of writ within thirty days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within twenty days after the return. Petitioner’s physical presence before this court is not required. Gaskins v. Shiplevy (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 380, 382, 667 N.E.2d 1194, 1196.

Douglas, Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent and would dismiss this cause.

Case Details

Case Name: Reed v. Kinkela
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 9, 1998
Citation: 84 Ohio St. 3d 1427
Docket Number: 98-2041
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.