History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reed v. Coots
43 Mich. 321
Mich.
1880
Check Treatment
Marston, C. J.

It appears in these proceedings that the attorney of Frank GL Baker claims a lien upon the1 judgment for services and disbursements, to the amount thereof, and that he had so notified the sheriff. That officer has no judicial power to fix and determine the amount of such lien. The amount may be disputed by Baker, and if the right of set-off existed might also be questioned by Mrs. Reed. If questioned, the matter could only be settled by agreement of the parties in interest or by going into court. Under these circumstances the writ of mandamus should not issue to the sheriff, and must be denied.

The other Justices concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Reed v. Coots
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 21, 1880
Citation: 43 Mich. 321
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.