6 Alaska 370 | D. Alaska | 1921
No action abates by reason of the appointment of a receiver, nor does such appointment stay or enjoin prosecution of such action to judgment. The appointment of a receiver simply marshals the assets for proper distribution, and prior claims and liens having preference still hold their place. By the appointment of the receiver the assets are held in trust for payment to those legally and ultimately entitled thereto, the receiver acquiring no other, greater, or better right or title than the debtor had in the first instance.
To enable him to raise any question as to any matter in this suit the party raising the same must be a party thereto. Powell is not properly before the court for any purpose. His remedy is to intervene and ask to be heard to have his rights adjudicated. The court has permitted this special appearance, and heard counsel for its enlightenment that he might be better informed as to the conditions and facts surrounding this case.
Having all the facts in mind, what is the situation that confronts us ? The record (over which there is no dispute) shows that the plaintiff herein applied to the Virginia court (the court of original jurisdiction) for the appointment of a receiver of the defendant corporation; that Norman C. Stines was appointed the duly authorizéd receiver, by said Virginia court, of the defendant corporation. The plaintiff now appears in this court and asks that an ancillary receiver be appointed, in' aid of the Virginia' court, of all property of the defendant corporation within the jurisdiction of this court, and further requests that Norman C. Stines be named such ancillary receiver, which is right and proper, and practically all the authorities so hold, reserving for itself, however, the scope of such aid.
All the property and assets of the defendant corporation for which the receiver was appointed in the Virginia court and now seeks ancillary .appointment in aid thereof in this court being within the jurisdiction of this court, said appointment can and should be made. However, the authority under such appointment cannot and should not be made which would in any wise hamper, incumber, or in any way interfere with the securities, such as mortgages, etc., within this jurisdiction. He cannot attach the expense of the receivership so
There is a present indebtedness against the défendant corporation of about $1,000,000 evidenced by mortgages and unsecured creditors, carrying a yearly interest of about $70,000. $100,000 is now due under a certain trust deed, mortgage, and notes held by E. E. Powell, as trustee. In fact, foreclosure proceedings have been instituted and are now on file in this court; therefore the receiver standing in the place of the debt- or would only have the right to the equity, if any there be, unless the same be paid.
It seems to me that, in order to save time, conflicting suits, unnecessary expense, and depreciation of the property, and to protect the various interests of all concerned and thus affected, there ought to be a consolidation of all the interests, the mortgages foreclosed, and the property sold at once.
In accordance .with the foregoing views, I will appoirrt the Virginia receiver, Norman C. Stines, as ancillary receiver in this court, and fix his bond at the sum of $5,000 (while in aid of the Virginia court, he will be directly responsible to this court in the first instance for all the property withiri its jurisdiction, making his ultimate findings and return to the Virginia court), adopt all the orders and findings of the Virginia court not in conflict with this order, and consolidate the Powell foreclosure case, if necessary, and steps will be taken to bring all' the other conflicting interests within and settled in this action.
„ You may present such an order, and we will proceed along these lines.
@=3See same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes