History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reece v. Chaney
114 P. 608
Okla.
1911
Check Treatment

It appears from a motion filed herein and the answer thereto, that, since the institution of this proceeding in error, all the matters in controversy involved in this action have been settled between the parties, except the costs of this proceeding, and a decision upon the questions of law raised in this proceeding could not afford any relief to the parties hereto, except to determine who shall pay the cost. It is a well-settled rule in this court that it will not decide abstract or hypothetical questions from which no practical relief will follow. Hodges et al. v. Schafer, 23 Okla. 404,100 P. 537; Albright et al. v. Erickson, 23 Okla. 544,102 P. 112.

The cause is accordingly dismissed.

TURNER, C. J., and DUNN and KANE, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., not participating. *Page 502

Case Details

Case Name: Reece v. Chaney
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Mar 21, 1911
Citation: 114 P. 608
Docket Number: 181
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.