History
  • No items yet
midpage
Redman v. Gulnac
5 Cal. 148
Cal.
1855
Check Treatment
Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Bryan, J., concurred.

It was error, after the jury had retired, to allow them to come into Court and instruct them, in the absence of the parties or their counsels.

Such instructions will be considered important if the contrary is not shown, from the very fact that the jury have asked for them. The certificate of the Judge of the Court below is a sufficient authentication of the statement. An appellant cannot be defeated of his rights by any such proceeding. If the respondent did not think proper to file amendments, or the Judge to correct the statement, the certificate of that fact by the Judge is all that is necessary.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and new trial granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Redman v. Gulnac
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1855
Citation: 5 Cal. 148
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.