midpage

Reagan v. StateReagan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Nov 29, 1995
No. 95-105
Versions:667 So. 2d 378
1995 WL 700376
1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12673
PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress. The trial court found that the initial stop was illegal, and we find that there were no legally sufficient intervening circumstances which would result in the ultimate search not being considered fruits of the poisonous tree. See Libby v. State, 561 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Kimbrough v. State, 539 So.2d 619 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); and Rozier v. State, 368 So.2d 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The judgment below is reversed, and the case remanded with directions to grant the motion to suppress.

WOLF, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Reagan v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 29, 1995
Citations: 667 So. 2d 378; 1995 WL 700376; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12673; No. 95-105
Docket Number: No. 95-105
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In