History
  • No items yet
midpage
Read v. Power
12 R.I. 16
R.I.
1878
Check Treatment

That where an absolute interest is given to the cestuis quetrust, without any control in the trustee, it is, as a general rule, alienable, is pretty well settled. Perry on Trusts, §§ 386-388; 1 Cruise Dig. *407, *343.

In the present case we cannot consider the estate as executed in the cestui, because the trustee has still a duty to perform,i.e. to convey the estate upon a certain event which, it is agreed, has happened.

Where the cestui has occupied for a long time, a court will, in some cases, direct a jury to presume a conveyance from the trustee, if necessary to perfect the legal title; and where a court would direct a jury to do it, the court may well act themselves upon the same presumption. 1 Cruise Dig. *415.

In the present case we do not think the circumstances would warrant acting upon any such presumption.

A decree may be made for a specific performance of an agreement to convey an equitable estate if it be so expressed in the agreement. Sugden Vend. Pur. cap. 8, sec. 2, § 2. In the 8th Amer. ed., by Perkins, cap. 5, sec. 3, § 50.

But as in this case the agreement does not specify it to be an equitable estate, the purchaser is entitled, if he chooses, to have the estate perfected by a conveyance from the trustees, at the expense of the vendor, otherwise he ought not to be obliged to accept the title.

Case Details

Case Name: Read v. Power
Court Name: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Date Published: Jan 5, 1878
Citation: 12 R.I. 16
Court Abbreviation: R.I.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.