4 Dem. Sur. 333 | N.Y. Sur. Ct. | 1886
To the account of this decedent’s executrix a single objection has been interposed in behalf of the residuary legatees. It is claimed that the accounting party is not entitled to be credited, as.she claims to be credited, for an item of 1350, disbursed by 'her as counsel fees in the course of her administration of the estate". The question raised by this objection has been submitted for determination upon affidavits filed by the respective ■ parties.'
The authority of this court to allow an executor or administrator to reimburse himself out of his decedent’s estate for sums expended by him in its administration, is solely derived from chapter 362 of the Laws of 1863. The justice and reasonableness of such expenditures must be established to the satisfaction of the Surrogate, before such expenditures can be sanctioned as a claim against the estate. If credit is asked for moneys paid to counsel, it must be shown that the services rendered by such counsel were necessary, or seemed to be necessary, and that they merited the compensation awarded them by the representative of the estate (St. John v. McKee, 2 Dem., 236; Journault v. Ferris, id., 320).
Now it appears, from the affidavit of the attorney for the accounting party, that to a considerable extent the services performed by him, at the instance of the executrix, were such as the executrix herself might justly have been expected to render, and for the rendering of which a right to commissions by way of compensation is accorded by law. The assets left by. the decedent consisted solely of moneys in
