71-2737 | 9th Cir. | Jan 29, 1973

469 F.2d 1394" date_filed="1973-01-29" court="9th Cir." case_name="Raymond M. Hamilton v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, (Two Cases)">469 F.2d 1394

Raymond M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Defendant-Appellant (two cases).

Nos. 71-2737, 71-2844.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1973.

Sanford Svetcov, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), W. Eric Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Emil Roy Eisenhardt (argued), Lee Van Boven, of Farella, Braun & Martel, San Francisco, Cal., Michael E. Smith, Berkeley, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge. Hamilton v. Craven, 350 F. Supp. 1251" date_filed="1971-08-02" court="N.D. Cal." case_name="Hamilton v. Craven">350 F.Supp. 1251 (N.D.Cal.1971). We do not reach other issues raised by appellant or by appellee on the cross-appeal.

2

Judgment affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.