History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ray v. State
2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 362
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2003
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lynn Ray appeals from a judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2002, unless otherwise indicated.

Case Details

Case Name: Ray v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 18, 2003
Citation: 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 362
Docket Number: No. ED 81408
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.