midpage

Ray v. FitchRay v. Fitch

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Aug 15, 1791
Reporters:
By the Court.

The writ of error is insufficient.

The statute is — “ That the Superior and ‍‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​‍County Courts, shall and may from time to time, as occasion shall require, and as shall by them be judged reasonable and proper; grant new trials of causes, that shall come before ‍‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​‍them, for mis-pleading, or discovery of new evidence, or for other reasonable cause appearing, according to the common and usual rules and methods in such cases.” The power given to the courts ‍‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​‍by the statute, granting new trials, in the causes which come before them, for the reasons therein enumerated, is a discretionary power, and it has been determined, that a writ of ‍‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​‍error doth not lie against a judgment of a court, merely for granting a hew trial. Kimball v. Cady, Kirby, 26. And a writ of error will not lie against any interlocutory ‍‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​‍judgment, before final judgment is given. See Carpenter v. Childs, determined at Windham, March Term, 1790.

Case Details

Case Name: Ray v. Fitch
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Aug 15, 1791
Citation: 1 Root 290
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
Log In