| Ga. | Mar 19, 1910
In a suit against a mortgagor individually to foreclose a mortgage on land, it is no defense to the foreclosure that after the mortgage was given a part of the land covered by the mortgage had been set apart to the defendant as the head of a family for a homestead. See Rutledge v. McFarland, 75 Ga. 774; Derrick v. Sams, 98 Ga. 397 (25 S. E. 509, 58 Am. St. Rep. 309" date_filed="1896-05-04" court="Ga." case_name="Derrick v. Sams">58 Am. St. R. 309). There was no error in striking so much of the plea as sought to set up. such defense.
Judgment affirmed.