History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ratajczak v. Yoonessi
15 N.Y.3d 745
| NY | 2010
|
Check Treatment

Motion for reargument etc. denied [see 14 NY3d 795 (2010)]. Motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Chief Judge Lippman, dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has *746no authority to entertain the motion made on nonstatutory grounds. The application seeking recusal is referred to the Chief Judge for his individual consideration and determination. Chief Judge Lippman denies the referred motion for recusal.

Case Details

Case Name: Ratajczak v. Yoonessi
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 29, 2010
Citation: 15 N.Y.3d 745
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.