133 Wis. 205 | Wis. | 1907
Tbe defendant contends, first, that the evidence of tbe plaintiff and bis fellow-worlanan is so inherently improbable and so contrary to well-known natural laws-that tbe court should have directed a verdict for tbe defendant. This inherent improbability is supposed to be furnished
By the Court. — Judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.