History
  • No items yet
midpage
Raskin v. Kletter
201 A.D. 858
N.Y. App. Div.
1922
Check Treatment

Order consolidating actions reversed, without costs, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion upon papers showing whether defendant Canter has been served with process in the Municipal Court, and if he has been served, that he has received notice of the application to consolidate.* Blaekmar, P. J., Kelly, Jayeox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

See Civ. Prae. Act, §§ 96, 97.— [Rep.

Case Details

Case Name: Raskin v. Kletter
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 15, 1922
Citation: 201 A.D. 858
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.