Rangel v. State, 532 So. 2d 84

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence in excess of the guidelines without providing written reasons. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); e.g., Foster v. State, 491 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. Dougfield v. State, 529 So.2d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Contra Waldron v. State, 529 So.2d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (en banc). See also Brumley v. State, 520 So.2d 275 (Fla.1988); Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987); Harris v. State, 520 So.2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Case Details

Case Name: Rangel v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Oct 18, 1988

Citations: 532 So. 2d 84; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2346; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4606; 1988 WL 107069; No. 88-167

Docket Number: No. 88-167

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.