Case Information
*1 AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed January 12, 2015.
In The No. 05-14-00155-CR No. 05-14-00156-CR No. 05-14-00157-CR No. 05-14-00158-CR RANDY ALEXANDER REYES, Appellant V.
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-35901-U, F13-34158-U, F13-34208-U, F13-34209-U MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Myers Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers
Randy Alexander Reyes appeals his convictions for burglary of a habitation, aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon (two offenses), and possession of alprazolam in an amount less
than twenty-eight grams within a drug-free zone. See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . §§ 29.03(a)(2), 30.02(a)(1) (West 2011 & Supp. 2014); T EX . H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN . §§ 481.117(a), (b), 481.134(e) (West 2010 & Supp. 2014). The trial court assessed punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment for burglary; twenty-five years’ imprisonment for each aggravated robbery; and two years’ confinement in State jail for possession of alprazolam. On appeal, appellant’s *2 attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.
We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE Do Not Publish
T EX . R. A PP . P. 47
140155F.U05
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is